Shristi Shrestha
  • Shristi Shrestha

  • Phd Candidate

  • Computer Science and Engineering

  • Louisiana State University

    Baton Rouge, LA

About Me

I am pursuing a Ph.D. in Computer Science with Dr. Anas Mahmoud as my advisor. My dissertation is on leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to address the needs of mobile app users and developers. I apply natural language processing (NLP), qualitative analysis, and statistical methods to gain insights from user feedback. I also investigate mobile app store policies on app testing and feature requirements and examine their impact on app development workflows.

Publications

  • From Policy to Practice: An Investigation of the Apple App Store Account Deletion Requirements

    S. Shrestha and A. Mahmoud, IEEE Software, 2026

    Mobile UI/UX Study Developer study Platform Policy Analysis
    Read summary
    Problem

    On June 30, 2022, Apple introduced an App Store policy requiring apps that support account creation to also offer an in-app account deletion option. The policy is intended to grant end-users control over their personal data in iOS apps. After three years of enforcement, the influence of such a policy on the state of practice is still yet to be explored. Has this policy achieved the intended goals?

    Solution

    In this study, we investigate App Store apps' compliance to the policy by actually deleting an account.

    Data

    We sampled 50 apps (five from 10 domains). For each app, we logged every screen, click, and notification involved in requesting account deletion over eight weeks of manual testing. We also interviewed 14 iOS developers and conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

    Results

    We found persistent use of dark design patterns to dissuade users from deleting their accounts. Patterns include confirm-shaming, nudging, obstructive discovery, hidden information, forced action, and disparate treatment. Interviews suggested that many developers treat the policy as a compliance checkbox rather than a real user need with assumptions that users care about account deletion as little as they do.

  • Leveraging GPT-4o to Evaluate the Usability and Accessibility of Flutter App Interfaces

    S. Shrestha and A. Mahmoud, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 2026

    LLM-based code review Developer study Static code analysis
    Read summary
    Problem

    In recent years, Flutter has emerged as a popular framework for building cross-platform mobile applications. However, ensuring the usability and accessibility of Flutter app interfaces remains a challenge. Developers often struggle to identify and address usability and accessibility issues which can lead to suboptimal user experiences.

    Solution

    Built FUEL, a tool powered by GPT-4o to evaluate the usability and accessibility of Flutter app interfaces. FUEL takes a Flutter app's source code as input and generates a detailed report highlighting usability and accessibility issues, along with actionable code fixes.

    Data

    We evaluated FUEL on a dataset of 15 UI screens from open source Flutter apps. We recruited 15 developers to assess the usability and accessibility of these screens, and compared their evaluations with FUEL's assessments.

    Results

    Generic prompting can effectively identify usability and accessibility issues, suggest code-level fixes, and point out potential app store policy violations. The performance of GPT-4o under more structured prompting conditions biased the model's findings toward checklist-compliant surface concerns, while overlooking context-sensitive and framework-related issues. Our exit survey revealed FUEL can save developer time in improving Flutter UIs and address issues beyond functional errors in Flutter widgets.

  • Automatic Summarization of Mobile Application Reviews using Chain of Density Prompting

    S. Shrestha and A. Mahmoud, Automated Software Engineering Journal (ASEJ), 2025

    LLM-based text summarization Recall analysis Performance analysis of multiple LLMs Cost-latency analysis of LLMs Review entity analysis Readability user study Non-parametric statistical analysis
    Read summary
    Problem

    Popular apps receive thousands of reviews daily. Users cannot read them all to make informed decisions, and existing star-rating systems fail to capture specific user needs. For example, stock trading app users expect seamless transaction executions, transparent pricing, no hidden fees, and strategy resources for maximizing their returns on investments (ROI). Users navigating current app review systems are forced to navigate a diverse array of feedback, including bug reports and feature requests, to determine if the app matches their user goals.

    Solution

    We propose an LLM-based app review summarization technique to extract and present fixed length summaries for apps. We apply the Chain of Density prompting (originally designed for news articles) with a focus on summarizing users' experiences with mobile app features/services. Unlike news articles, app reviews represent voices of thousands of users and discuss various topics related to the app. Given a list of app reviews, we instruct an LLM to iteratively identify review entities and fuse them into a fixed-length summary (120 words) that can fit in a mobile screen.

    Data

    Summarized a dataset of 37,245 reviews collected from eight popular apps across four application domains: Ride-hailing, Online Dating, Investing, and Mental Health. For fair representation of different ratings in the reviews, we employed stratified sampling based on star ratings (1-5 stars) and used Hybrid TF-IDF ranking to sample 2.8k high-information reviews. We used GPT-4 to generate abstractive summaries of the sampled reviews using multiple prompts.

    Results

    The modified version of CoD prompting achieved an average recall of 81% for key review entities, significantly outperforming vanilla prompts (64%) and extractive summarization (60%) baselines. Our user study with 48 participants demonstrated that the generated summaries maintained high readability even as their semantic density increased. Comparative analysis revealed that while GPT-4 produced the most balanced summaries in terms of coherence and density, Gemini-1.5-Flash and Llama-3.1 offered lower-cost alternatives with varying trade-offs in summary length and sentiment retention.

  • No Country for Indie Developers: A Study of Google Play's Closed Testing Requirements for New Personal Developer Accounts

    G. Shrestha, S. Shrestha, and A. Mahmoud, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (ACM TOSEM), 2025

    Qualitative thematic analysis Developer survey Inter-rater reliability Play Store App Testing Policy
    Read summary
    Problem

    Put yourself in the position of an indie developer. You are aiming to solve a niche problem, have spent months in building a viable product, and want to start marketing your product to real customers. Google's Play Store policy now requires you to find 12 (was 20 before) testers willing to test (interact) your app everyday for two weeks. As per the policy, you can reach out to your friends, family, colleagues, or social media forums to find those testers. Now, indie developers need to spend (extra) time hunting down testers and ensuring they all pass the test before releasing their apps.

    Solution

    We conducted a mixed-method study to investigate how developers have perceived the policy and how they have adapted their developer workflows to comply with the policy. First, we performed qualitative thematic analysis of Reddit comments about the policy. Second, we ran a 15-min survey with developers who faced the policy in releasing their own apps on Play Store.

    Data

    We analyzed 897 comments from 564 users posted on 38 subreddit threads. Then, we surveyed 14 indie developers, asking them two questions about the policy: a) strategies to comply with the policy, b) assessment of the policy requirements.

    Results

    We found developers expressing frustration on several Reddit posts and shared their logistical barriers to adopting the policy. Several job posts appeared on online Gig platforms like Fiverr asking/calling for testers. Redditors reported concerns over such growing a market (e.g., 'potential scams', 'black market', 'sweatshops'). During interviews, some developers expressed that the policy discriminated them in favor of corporate developers.

  • Generating Rate Features for Mobile Applications

    S. Shrestha and A. Mahmoud, Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (ICSE MobileSoft), 2024

    Prompt engineering and analysis Zero-shot prompting NLTK Gensim GloVe embeddings Qualitative thematic analysis Recall analysis Pandas Scikit-learn
    Read summary
    Problem

    Finding an app that meets specific user criteria is difficult because the current 'one-size-fits-all' 5-star rating system in app stores fails to capture domain-specific needs. This forces users to spend significant time scrolling through thousands of diverse, unstructured reviews to locate relevant information.

    Solution

    We developed an automated, unsupervised pipeline that uses a large language model (LLM) to generate 'Rate Features' from long, unstructured app reviews. 'Rate features' are neutral, domain-specific, concise summaries (2-3 words) of the reviews. We first filter informative reviews using Hybrid TF.IDF extractive summarization method. Then, we use GPT-3.5-turbo to generate 'Rate Features' from the filtered reviews.

    Data

    Generated 'Rate Features' from 167k reviews of 90 popular apps across three domains: Ride-hailing, Mental Health, and Investing.

    Results

    Our qualitative analysis revealed that users in different application domain express desires for different application features. The model identified user goals described in the reviews as the best candidates for Rate features. Other prompting approaches, such as mining non-functional requirements for Rate Features, produced user concerns that were highly abstract, difficult to interpret, and frequently repeated across multiple domains. Top three frequently appearing 'Rate Features' recalled 95-100% of the user goals in the analyzed reviews.

Research Interests

Software Engineering Requirement Engineering Natural Language Processing App Store Requirement Analysis User Interface Design Analysis Human Computer Interactions Qualitative Analysis

Education

  • Louisiana State University

    Ph.D. Candidate in Computer Science; GPA: 3.91

    Dissertation title: “Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance the Utility of Mobile App Store Rating Systems”

    Baton Rouge, LA, USA

  • Tribhuwan University, Pulchowk Campus

    Bachelor in Computer Engineering; GPA: 3.75

    Lalitpur, Nepal

Teaching

Louisiana State University

  • Programming Lab Assistant (3 hr, 30 students)

    Supervised first-year undergraduate computer science students in their lab assignments for the ''Introduction to the Java programming language'' course, helping students work through programming and debugging.

  • Graduate Teaching Assistant (3 hr, 100+ students)

    Assisted with grading midterm and final exams for ''Software Systems Design'' and ''Programming Language.'' Designed a full project-assignment module covering product strategy documentation, Figma-based UI/UX design, and code/testing evaluation (GitHub activity, commit history, automated tests); coordinated student project groups, proctored exams, and led a session on Git/GitHub workflows.

Technical Skills

  • Programming Languages

    Python, Java, Kotlin, JavaScript (JS), Dart

  • AI / LLM Tooling

    Batch Tasks, Function/tool calling, Embeddings & Vector Search

  • Frameworks & Tools

    SpringBoot, Next.js, React (library), Flutter (SDK), Figma, NLTK, Git

  • Cloud Technologies

    Firebase (Auth, Functions, FireStore, NextJS integration), Google Cloud Run, AWS

  • Database

    PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, HBase